C0PPUS vs Maherco: Streamer Stats, Viewers & Diagnostic Comparison
Compare observed peak viewership, interval-integrated average viewers, hours watched, diagnostic signal scores, and disclosed bio domains across 2 to 5 channels simultaneously.
C0PPUS
Kick English Β· Rank #726
Sole leader in 2 metrics Β· Bio: stake.us
Maherco
Kick Arabic Β· Rank #4
Sole leader in 8 metrics Β· Bio: 21.games
Overlaid Daily Average Viewers (Absolute Viewers)
Executive Multi-Channel Summary
- Observed Peak Scale: Maherco holds the highest observed peak at 50,115 CCV (Rank #4) vs. 1,331 for C0PPUS.
- 30D Average Concurrency: Maherco leads measured concurrency with 32,344 average viewers across 9 monitored sessions.
- Audience Diagnostic Score: Maherco scores 67/100 vs. 66/100 for C0PPUS (heuristic signal index, not proof of viewbotting).
- Data Coverage Notice: C0PPUS (10 sessions, 35% interval coverage), Maherco (9 sessions, 16% interval coverage) has limited measured telemetry in the 30D window; treat period averages as partial samples.
| Metric / Signal | C0PPUS | Maherco |
|---|---|---|
| Highest observed peak viewers |
1,331
|
50,115 Lead
|
| Global rank by peak viewers |
#726
|
#4 Lead
|
| Period peak viewers (30D) |
62
|
50,115 Lead
|
| Avg. live viewers (30D, Measured) |
25
|
32,344 Lead
|
| Hours watched (30D) |
96h
|
1,231,022h Lead
|
| Monitored broadcasts (30D) |
10 Lead
|
9
|
| Telemetry coverage (30D) |
35% Lead
|
16%
|
| Avg. viewer growth (30D vs prev) | Unavailable (<5 sess.) | Unavailable (<5 sess.) |
| Audience diagnostic score (/100) |
66 / 100 (3 vec)
|
67 / 100 (5 vec) Lead
|
| Registered followers (all platforms) |
5,671
|
1,029,817 Lead
|
| Peak Γ· followers ratio (descriptive) |
23.5%
|
4.9%
|
| Average broadcast duration (descriptive) |
0h 23m
|
4h 14m
|
| Recorded broadcast archives (VODs) |
10
|
36 Lead
|
| Highest clip multiplier recorded | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Disclosed bio / referral domains (descriptive) |
1 (1 ref)
|
1 (0 ref)
|
Top Streamed Slots by Channel
Disclosed Bio Link Overlap
No overlapping casino or sponsor bio domains were detected across these channels.
Comparison FAQ: C0PPUS vs Maherco
Who has more viewers: C0PPUS vs Maherco?
C0PPUS has an observed peak of 1,331 concurrent viewers (Rank #726) and 5,671 followers; Maherco has an observed peak of 50,115 concurrent viewers (Rank #4) and 1,029,817 followers.
How do Audience Diagnostic Scores compare between C0PPUS vs Maherco?
C0PPUS holds an Audience Diagnostic heuristic score of 66/100 (3 active vectors); Maherco holds an Audience Diagnostic heuristic score of 67/100 (5 active vectors). Scores are statistical diagnostic signals derived from public telemetry, not factual proof of artificial viewership.
Do C0PPUS vs Maherco link to the same casino brands in their bios?
No overlapping casino or sponsor domains were detected across the compared channel bios.