Zumpa vs Maherco: Streamer Stats, Viewers & Diagnostic Comparison
Compare observed peak viewership, interval-integrated average viewers, hours watched, diagnostic signal scores, and disclosed bio domains across 2 to 5 channels simultaneously.
Zumpa
Kick Czech Β· Rank #4,514
Sole leader in 1 metrics Β· Bio: No Bio Links
Maherco
Kick Arabic Β· Rank #1
Sole leader in 5 metrics Β· Bio: 21.games
Overlaid Daily Average Viewers (Absolute Viewers)
Executive Multi-Channel Summary
- Observed Peak Scale: Maherco holds the highest observed peak at 43,336 CCV (Rank #1) vs. 171 for Zumpa.
- 30D Average Concurrency: Direct period average comparison requires measured telemetry on at least 2 channels (1 of 2 currently have 30D sessions).
- Audience Diagnostic Score: Zumpa scores 88/100 vs. 75/100 for Maherco (heuristic signal index, not proof of viewbotting).
| Metric / Signal | Zumpa | Maherco |
|---|---|---|
| Highest observed peak viewers |
171
|
43,336 Lead
|
| Global rank by peak viewers |
#4,514
|
#1 Lead
|
| Period peak viewers (30D) | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Avg. live viewers (30D, Measured) | Unavailable |
31,426
|
| Hours watched (30D) | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Monitored broadcasts (30D) |
9
|
33 Lead
|
| Telemetry coverage (30D) | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Avg. viewer growth (30D vs prev) | Unavailable (<5 sess.) | Unavailable (<5 sess.) |
| Audience diagnostic score (/100) |
88 / 100 (1 vec) Lead
|
75 / 100 (2 vec)
|
| Registered followers (all platforms) |
5,231
|
1,029,817 Lead
|
| Peak Γ· followers ratio (descriptive) |
3.3%
|
4.2%
|
| Average broadcast duration (descriptive) |
11h 49m
|
8h 04m
|
| Recorded broadcast archives (VODs) |
30
|
36 Lead
|
| Highest clip multiplier recorded | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Disclosed bio / referral domains (descriptive) |
0 (No Bio Links)
|
1 (0 ref)
|
Top Streamed Slots by Channel
Disclosed Bio Link Overlap
No overlapping casino or sponsor bio domains were detected across these channels.
Comparison FAQ: Zumpa vs Maherco
Who has more viewers: Zumpa vs Maherco?
Zumpa has an observed peak of 171 concurrent viewers (Rank #4,514) and 5,231 followers; Maherco has an observed peak of 43,336 concurrent viewers (Rank #1) and 1,029,817 followers.
How do Audience Diagnostic Scores compare between Zumpa vs Maherco?
Zumpa holds an Audience Diagnostic heuristic score of 88/100 (1 active vectors); Maherco holds an Audience Diagnostic heuristic score of 75/100 (2 active vectors). Scores are statistical diagnostic signals derived from public telemetry, not factual proof of artificial viewership.
Do Zumpa vs Maherco link to the same casino brands in their bios?
No overlapping casino or sponsor domains were detected across the compared channel bios.